Brand

Why brand trust and consumer participation are the metrics to watch as AI takes over

May 5, 2025

Paramark News Desk

Credit: Outlever

Key Points

  • Havas Edge economist Thomas J. Thompson advocates for a shift from traditional attribution models to measuring consumer "willingness to participate" as a precursor to purchase.

  • Successful brands focus on generating consumer desire before introducing price, he argues.

  • AI's role in marketing is evolving, with consumers trusting AI embedded in established brands over general AI for decision-making.


I believe, as an economist, that we have too many attribution models that exist right now. And I think the best way to measure attention is: what level of attention prompted you to take an action.

Thomas J. Thompson

Chief Economist
,
Havas Edge

As the marketing world grapples with AI, attribution challenges, and consumers in information overload, the old rules of measuring success are falling short. Focusing solely on clicks or traditional "willingness to pay" metrics misses the crucial precursors to action. Instead, understanding a consumer's "willingness to participate" and leveraging brand trust is becoming the true differentiator.

Thomas J. Thompson, Chief Economist at Havas Edge, integrates behavioral economics and AI to help clients navigate this shifting landscape. His work involves empowering account teams with future-focused insights and analyzing the unpredictable factors that change consumer behavior. He argues for a fundamental shift in how marketers measure attention and value.

Action over attribution: "I believe, as an economist, that current attribution models are too fragmented or overused," Thompson states. "And I think the best way to measure attention is: what level of attention prompted you to take an action." This moves beyond simply tracking touchpoints to understanding the motivation driving conversion.

Participate, then purchase: Thompson contrasts the old model with his updated framework. "Traditionally, economists focused on a concept called willingness to pay. And the idea was that people are rational," he explains. But modern consumers face a hurdle before price: "willingness to participate." Using a vacation analogy, he notes that before considering cost, someone must first decide if they can or want to take a trip based on job security or time off. No price, however low, matters if participation is off the table. Only then does "willingness to purchase" – influenced by budget and perceived value – come into play, replacing the simpler "willingness to pay."

Brands doing it right: This framework changes how brands should approach consumers. "What's really fascinating is this is where brands that are doing it right are starting to tell this integrated message across all media and all touch points without worrying about where they are," Thompson observes. Successful brands first generate desire ("willingness to participate") with evocative content, like travel imagery, rather than leading with price. Only after capturing interest do they introduce offers to move consumers toward purchase.

"Based on what I’ve seen in the market, there's probably about 30% of the brands that I think have adopted this," he estimates. "If I drive willingness to participate and willingness to purchase, then I have a very logical model." Focusing too heavily on attributing individual touchpoints, he warns, means "you're moving all these levers and you're not adapting to how consumers now process information."

We find that there's not enough brand equity amongst the true generative AIs. But the brands that are using AI correctly are incorporating it into a decision making process because they're relying on their brand equity to do it.

Thomas J. Thompson

Chief Economist
,
Havas Edge

AI and the trust factor: When asked about AI's role, Thompson jokes, "In the world of economists, we're still arguing over the impact of the French Revolution." But based on current behavior, he sees a clear pattern. Consumers use general AI (like ChatGPT) for initial exploration but rely on the AI embedded within trusted brands (like Expedia) for actual decisions. "It's interesting to me that one of these foundations from the days of Ogilvy in the 50s, which is brands matter," still holds true, he says, using the example of asking Expedia's AI, not a general chatbot, for specific travel deals. "We find that there's not enough brand equity amongst the true generative AIs. But the brands that are using AI correctly are incorporating it into a decision making process because they're relying on their brand equity to do it."

Integrated future: Brands still have a significant opportunity with AI, particularly by integrating it seamlessly into platforms consumers already trust. "If you can get a payment program, a messaging program, social media – if you can get all those things into one platform, you're not asking people to change their brand behavior," Thompson suggests.

He speculates on futures like Elon Musk bundling Grok AI with T-Mobile via Starlink, leveraging existing loyalty rather than creating a new AI brand. "Somewhere those things are going to merge," he predicts. Ultimately, the viability of AI hinges on sustainable models. "People are worried about the financial models of AI right now: how does it make money? You can't sustain the business like this forever without having some product on the backside." Finding that sustainable path, built on trust and real value, will define the next chapter.

Brand

Why brand trust and consumer participation are the metrics to watch as AI takes over

May 5, 2025

Paramark News Desk

Credit: Outlever

Key Points

  • Havas Edge economist Thomas J. Thompson advocates for a shift from traditional attribution models to measuring consumer "willingness to participate" as a precursor to purchase.

  • Successful brands focus on generating consumer desire before introducing price, he argues.

  • AI's role in marketing is evolving, with consumers trusting AI embedded in established brands over general AI for decision-making.


I believe, as an economist, that we have too many attribution models that exist right now. And I think the best way to measure attention is: what level of attention prompted you to take an action.

Thomas J. Thompson

Chief Economist
,
Havas Edge

As the marketing world grapples with AI, attribution challenges, and consumers in information overload, the old rules of measuring success are falling short. Focusing solely on clicks or traditional "willingness to pay" metrics misses the crucial precursors to action. Instead, understanding a consumer's "willingness to participate" and leveraging brand trust is becoming the true differentiator.

Thomas J. Thompson, Chief Economist at Havas Edge, integrates behavioral economics and AI to help clients navigate this shifting landscape. His work involves empowering account teams with future-focused insights and analyzing the unpredictable factors that change consumer behavior. He argues for a fundamental shift in how marketers measure attention and value.

Action over attribution: "I believe, as an economist, that current attribution models are too fragmented or overused," Thompson states. "And I think the best way to measure attention is: what level of attention prompted you to take an action." This moves beyond simply tracking touchpoints to understanding the motivation driving conversion.

Participate, then purchase: Thompson contrasts the old model with his updated framework. "Traditionally, economists focused on a concept called willingness to pay. And the idea was that people are rational," he explains. But modern consumers face a hurdle before price: "willingness to participate." Using a vacation analogy, he notes that before considering cost, someone must first decide if they can or want to take a trip based on job security or time off. No price, however low, matters if participation is off the table. Only then does "willingness to purchase" – influenced by budget and perceived value – come into play, replacing the simpler "willingness to pay."

Brands doing it right: This framework changes how brands should approach consumers. "What's really fascinating is this is where brands that are doing it right are starting to tell this integrated message across all media and all touch points without worrying about where they are," Thompson observes. Successful brands first generate desire ("willingness to participate") with evocative content, like travel imagery, rather than leading with price. Only after capturing interest do they introduce offers to move consumers toward purchase.

"Based on what I’ve seen in the market, there's probably about 30% of the brands that I think have adopted this," he estimates. "If I drive willingness to participate and willingness to purchase, then I have a very logical model." Focusing too heavily on attributing individual touchpoints, he warns, means "you're moving all these levers and you're not adapting to how consumers now process information."

We find that there's not enough brand equity amongst the true generative AIs. But the brands that are using AI correctly are incorporating it into a decision making process because they're relying on their brand equity to do it.

Thomas J. Thompson

Chief Economist
,
Havas Edge

AI and the trust factor: When asked about AI's role, Thompson jokes, "In the world of economists, we're still arguing over the impact of the French Revolution." But based on current behavior, he sees a clear pattern. Consumers use general AI (like ChatGPT) for initial exploration but rely on the AI embedded within trusted brands (like Expedia) for actual decisions. "It's interesting to me that one of these foundations from the days of Ogilvy in the 50s, which is brands matter," still holds true, he says, using the example of asking Expedia's AI, not a general chatbot, for specific travel deals. "We find that there's not enough brand equity amongst the true generative AIs. But the brands that are using AI correctly are incorporating it into a decision making process because they're relying on their brand equity to do it."

Integrated future: Brands still have a significant opportunity with AI, particularly by integrating it seamlessly into platforms consumers already trust. "If you can get a payment program, a messaging program, social media – if you can get all those things into one platform, you're not asking people to change their brand behavior," Thompson suggests.

He speculates on futures like Elon Musk bundling Grok AI with T-Mobile via Starlink, leveraging existing loyalty rather than creating a new AI brand. "Somewhere those things are going to merge," he predicts. Ultimately, the viability of AI hinges on sustainable models. "People are worried about the financial models of AI right now: how does it make money? You can't sustain the business like this forever without having some product on the backside." Finding that sustainable path, built on trust and real value, will define the next chapter.